Hi All,
PY-GB:
ER's pensionable pay (we use our custom wage type, which is a copy of /3P1 ER's Pensionable Pay) does not match EE's pensionable pay (/111) by an amount of one paid absence. In the payroll results table, ER's pensionable pay (/3P1) seems to equal /114 ER's Full Pensionable Pay, instead of /115 ER's Actual Pensionable Pay. That paid absence belongs to CN 15 in V_512W_D. Therefore, a solution would seem simple (adding the that paid absence to CN 14) and then ER's pensionable pay (/3P1) would probably equal /114, which in turn would possibly equal /111 but the question arises why/3P1 equals /114 and not /115. Could it be changed and if yes, how?
For example:
Wage type XXXX (a copy of /3P1) - ER's Pensionable Pay - 300 (amount)
WT/114 - ER's Full Pensionable Pay - 300
WT /115 - ER's Actual Pensionable Pay - 400
WT /111 - EE's Pensionable Pay - 400
WT YYYY (our custom paid absence, which belongs to CN 15 and does not belong to CN 14) - 100
Thanks
S